The maintenance and periodic painting of wood frame structures
is a time-consuming effort and often a substantial expense for
the homeowner. It is therefore understandable that a product which
promises relief from periodic painting and gives the building
a new exterior cladding would have considerable appeal. For these
reasons, aluminum and vinyl siding have been used extensively
in upgrading and rehabilitating the nation's stock of wood frame
residential buildings. For historic residential buildings, aluminum
or vinyl siding may be an acceptable alternative only if (1) the
existing siding is so deteriorated or damaged that it cannot be
repaired; (2) the substitute material can be installed without
irreversibly damaging or obscuring the architectural features
and trim of the building; and (3) the substitute material can
match the historic material in size, profile and finish so that
there is no change in the character of the historic building.
In cases where a non-historic artificial siding has been applied
to a building, the removal of such a siding, and the application
of aluminum or vinyl siding would, in most cases, be an acceptable
alternative, as long as the abovementioned first two conditions
are met.
There are, however, also certain disadvantages in the use of a
substitute material such as aluminum or vinyl siding, and these
factors should be carefully considered before a decision is made
to use such a material rather than the preferred replacement with
new wood siding duplicating the old.
Applying Siding without Dealing with Existing Problems
Since aluminum and vinyl sidings are typically marketed as home
improvement items, they are frequently applied to buildings in
need of maintenance and repair. This can result in concealing
problems which are the early warning signs of deterioration. Minor
uncorrected problems can progress to the point where expensive,
major repairs to the structure become necessary.
If there is a hidden source of water entry within the wall or
leakage from the roof, the installation of any new siding will
not solve problems of deterioration and rotting that are occurring
within the wall. If deferred maintenance has allowed water to
enter the wall through deteriorated gutters and downspouts, for
example, the cosmetic surface application of siding will not arrest
these problems. In fact, if the gutters and downspouts are not
repaired, such problems may become exaggerated because water may
be channeled behind the siding. In addition to drastically reducing
the efficiency of most types of wall insulation, such excessive
moisture levels within the wall can contribute to problems with
interior finishes such as paints or wallpaper, causing peeling,
blistering or staining of the finishes.
It cannot be overemphasized that a cosmetic treatment to hide
difficulties such as peeling paint, stains or other indications
of deterioration is not a sound preservation practice; it is no
substitute for proper care and maintenance. Aluminum and vinyl
siding are not directly at fault in these situations since property
owners should determine the nature and source of their problems,
then make appropriate repairs. The difficulty arises when owners
perceive the siding as the total solution to their required maintenance
and forgo other remedial action.