The character or "identity" of a historic building is
established by its form, size, scale and decorative features.
It is also influenced by the choice of materials for the walls--by
the dimension, detailing, color, and other surface characteristics.
This is particularly true for wood frame buildings which are the
typical objects of aluminum or vinyl siding applications. Since
wood has always been present in abundance in America, it has been
a dominant building material in most parts of the country. Early
craftsmen used wood for almost every aspect of building construction:
for structural members such as posts, beams and rafters, and for
cladding materials and decorative details, such as trim, shakes,
and siding.
Aluminum and vinyl siding are available in a variety of widths and colors, but the optional wood graining is not characteristic of real wood siding. Photo: NPS files.
|
The variety of tools used, coupled with regional differences in
design and craftsmanship, has resulted in a richness and diversity
of wood sidings in America. For example, narrow boards with beveled,
lapped joints called "clapboards" were used on New England
frame dwellings. The size and shape of the "clapboards"
were determined by the process of hand splitting or "riving"
bolts of wood. The width, the short lengths, the beveled lapping,
the "feathered" horizontal joints, and the surface nailing
of the clapboards created a distinctive surface pattern that is
recognizable as an important part of the historic character of
these structures.
The sawn and hand-planed clapboards used throughout the Mid-Atlantic
and Southern states in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries,
by contrast, have a wide exposure--generally between six and eight
inches. The exposure of the siding, frequently coupled with a
beaded edge, created a very different play of light and shadow
on the wall surface, thus resulting in a different character.
The "German" or "Novelty siding"--a milled
siding that is thin above and thicker below with a concave bevel--was
used throughout many parts of the United States in the late nineteenth
and early twentieth century but with regional variations in material,
profile, and dimensions. One variation of this type of milled
siding was called "California siding" and was milled
with a rabbetted or shiplap edge to insure a tight installation
of the weather boards. Shingles were also commonly used as an
exterior cladding material, and in buildings such as the Bungalow
style houses, were often an important character-defining feature
of the exterior. Shingles were often applied in decorative patterns
by varying the lap, thus creating alternating rows of narrow exposures
and wide exposures. Shingles were also cut in geometric patterns
such as diamond shapes and applied in patterns. This treatment
was commonly used in the gable end of shingled houses. Siding
and wood shingles were often used in combination with materials
such as cobblestone and brick in Bungalow style buildings to create
a distinctive interplay of surfaces and materials.
When aluminum was installed on the house on
the right, the barge boards, scrollwork, columns, and railings were removed. The distinctive shingled gable and attic vent were covered, further compromising the building's architectural integrity. Photo: NPS files.
|
The primary concern, therefore, in considering replacement siding
on a historic building, is the potential loss of those features
such as the beaded edge, "drop" profile, and the patterns
of application. Replacing historic wood siding with new wood,
or aluminum or vinyl siding could severely diminish the unique
aspects of historic materials and craftsmanship. The inappropriate
use of substitute siding is especially dramatic where sufficient
care is not taken by the owner or applicator and the width of
the clapboards is altered, shadow reveals are reduced, and molding
or trim is changed or removed at the corners, at cornices or around
windows and doors. Because substitute siding is usually added
on top of existing siding, details around windows and doors may
appear set back from the siding rather than slightly projecting;
and if the relationship of molding or trim to the wall is changed,
it can result in the covering or removal of these historic features.
New substitute siding with embossed wood graining--intended to
simulate the texture of wood--is also visually inappropriate.
Exaggerated graining would have been undesirable on real wood
siding and is generally found only after sandblasting, a destructive
and totally unacceptable treatment for wood.
While this discussion focuses primarily on the historic character
of individual wood frame buildings, of equal importance is the
context of buildings that comprise a historic district or neighborhood.
Changes to the character-defining features of a building, such
as distinctive clapboarding and other wall surfaces and decorative
trim, always have an impact on more than just that building; they
also alter the historic visual relationship between the buildings
in the district. If character-defining weatherboards, clapboards
or shingles are replaced on a number of buildings in a historic
district, the historic character of the entire district may be
seriously damaged. Because of the potential impact some substitute
materials have on the character of a neighborhood or district,
many communities regulate their use through zoning ordinances
and design review boards. These ordinances and review boards usually
require review and approval of proposed alterations to a historic
building that could potentially impact the historic character
of the building or the district, including the application of
substitute materials, such as aluminum or vinyl siding.
Preservation of a building or district and its historic character
is based on the assumption that the retention of historic materials
and features and their craftsmanship are of primary importance.
Therefore, the underlying issue in any discussion of replacement
materials is whether or not the integrity of historic materials
and craftsmanship has been lost. Structures are historic because
the materials and craftsmanship reflected in their construction
are tangible and irreplaceable evidence of our cultural heritage.
To the degree that substitute materials destroy and/or conceal
the historic fabric, they will always subtract from the basic
integrity of historically and architecturally significant buildings.