A technical discussion of composition is not complete without
an examination of the molds used to create the ornament. These
were the ornament maker's largest investment in time and expense,
and were the key to the craft.
Composition molds were always made of rigid materials that would
withstand the considerable pressure used in pressing the ornaments.
All of these materials and methods have been used in sculptural
crafts since the Renaissance. The comparative listing that follows
helps explain their advantages and disadvantages.
Wood was carved in reverse to create a negative matrix.
This was highly skilled work often performed by a specialist carver,
and required a large initial investment in time, but wooden molds
would essentially last indefinitely if properly maintained. A
further design advantage of reverse carving is that fine incised
lines will show up as fine raised lines in the final ornament.
(Fine raised lines are notoriously difficult to carve or model
in relief.) Molds carved from dense and close-grained fruit woods
such as apple and pear seem to have been common in the 18th century.
In the 19th century, the most intricate molds were carved in boxwood,
often encased or framed by larger and cheaper pieces of timber
for ease of handling and to prevent splitting.
Metal alloys such as brass, bronze, and pewter made excellent
molds capable of yielding the highest level of detail and were
virtually indestructible in use. They were expensive due to the
intrinsic value of the metal and because their production involved
a variety of complex and skilled steps performed by modelers,
pattern makers, and founders. Few historic metal molds have survived,
possibly as a result of war-time scrap drives.
Sulfur melts into a clear fluid at about 115 C and could
be poured over a positive clay model or another compo ornament.
A sulfur mold resembles hard plastic, but is more fragile. Even
when framed in wood and reinforced with iron fillings, as was
common practice, it was especially vulnerable to breakage. A figural
design, such as a frieze of The Three Graces, was
much easier to model in relief than to carve in reverse, and sulfur
was one of the few materials that could be used to make a hard
mold from a clay model.
This
finished length of compo molding is stuck to its pressing board. The newly made
piece will be sliced off the board, then applied. Photo: Jonathan Thornton.
|
Composition itself could be squeezed over a hard relief
pattern (such as another manufacturer's ornament) to make a mold.
Composition shrinks as it hardens and so the mold was always smaller
than the original. It is also fairly brittle when hard and, like
sulfur molds, would tend to crack in the press. Composition "squeeze
molds" were ideal for pirating another maker's patterns!
Pitch molds became popular during the late 19th and early
20th centuries. A warm and soft mixture composed primarily of
pine pitch was poured into a recess in a wood block or frame.
It was then turned over and squeezed down onto an oiled wooden
pattern. Pitch molds might crack with age or in the press, but
as long as the carved pattern was retained, they could be easily
re-made.