Planning for Lead Hazard Reduction in Historic Housing
Typical health department guidelines call for removing as much of the
surfaces that contain lead-based paint as possible. This results in extensive
loss or modification of architectural features and finishes and is not
appropriate for most historic properties. A great number of
federally-assisted housing programs are moving away from this approach
as too expensive and too dangerous to the immediate work environment. A
preferred approach, consistent with The Secretary of the Interior's Standards
for the Treatment of Historic Properties, calls for removing, controlling,
or managing the hazards rather than wholesale-or even partial-removal of
the historic features and finishes. This is generally achieved
through careful cleaning and treatment of deteriorating paint, friction
surfaces, surfaces accessible to young children, and lead in soil. Lead-based paint that it not causing a hazard is thus permitted
to remain, and, in consequence, the amount of historic finishes, features
and trimwork removed from a property is minimized.
Because the hazard of lead poisoning is tied to the risk of ingesting
lead, careful planning can help to determine how much risk is present and
how best to allocate available financial resources. An owner, with professional
assistance, can protect a historic resource and make it lead-safe using
this three-step planning process:
Deteriorating operable windows often contribute to lead dust in a house. In homes with small children, floors and other surfaces should be kept as clean as possible to avoid lead contamination.
|
I. Identify the historical significance of the building and architectural
character of its features and finishes
The historical significance, integrity, and architectural character
of the building always need to be assessed before work is undertaken that
might adversely affect them. An owner may need to enlist the help of a
preservation architect, building conservator or historian. The State Historic
Preservation Office (SHPO) may be able to provide a list of knowledgeable
preservation professionals who could assist with this evaluation.
Features and finishes of a historic building that exhibit distinctive
characteristics of an architectural style; represent work by specialized
craftsmen; or possess high artistic value should be identified so they
can be protected and preserved during treatment.
When it is absolutely
necessary to remove a significant architectural feature or finish-as noted
in the first two priorities listed below-it should be replaced with a new
feature and finish that matches in design, detail, color, texture, and,
in most cases, material.