This new stair tower addition on the rear elevation of a historic townhouse is compatible in size, scale, and materials. This approach meets the Standards for Rehabilitation. Photo: NPS files.
|
The second, equally important, consideration is whether or not
the new addition will preserve the resource's historic character.
The historic character of each building may differ, but a methodology
of establishing it remains the same. Knowing the uses and functions
a building has served over time will assist in making what is
essentially a physical evaluation. But while written and pictorial
documentation can provide a framework for establishing the building's
history, the historic character, to a large extent, is embodied
in the physical aspects of the historic building itself--its shape,
its materials, its features, its craftsmanship, its window arrangements,
its colors, its setting, and its interiors. It is only after the
historic character has been correctly identified that reasonable
decisions about the extent--or limitations--of change can be made.
To meet National Park Service preservation standards, a new addition
must be "compatible with the size, scale, color, material,
and character" of the building to which it is attached or
its particular neighborhood or district. A new addition will always
change the size or actual bulk of the historic building. But an
addition that bears no relationship to the proportions and massing
of the historic building--in other words, one that overpowers
the historic form and changes the scale will usually compromise
the historic character as well.
This new stairtower addition on a historic university building has been constructed on a highly visible side elevation. Together with its contrasting color and size, it obscures the historic form and roofline. This approach does not meet the Standards for Rehabilitation. Photo: Martha L. Werenfels, AIA.
|
The appropriate size for a new
addition varies from building to building; it could never be stated
in a tidy square or cubic footage ratio, but the historic building's
existing proportions, site, and setting can help set some general
parameters for enlargement. To some extent, there is a predictable
relationship between the size of the historic resource and the
degree of change a new addition will impose.
For example, in the case of relatively low buildings (small-scale
residential or commercial structures) it is difficult, if not
impossible, to minimize the impact of adding an entire new floor
even if the new addition is set back from the plane of the facade.
Alteration of the historic proportions and profile will likely
change the building's character. On the other hand, a rooftop
addition to an eight story building in a historic district of
other tall buildings might not affect the historic character simply
because the new work would not be visible from major streets.
A number of methods have been used to help predict the effect
of a proposed rooftop addition on the historic building and district,
including pedestrian sight lines, three-dimensional schematics
and computer-assisted design (CAD). Sometimes a rough full-size
mock up of a section or bay of the proposed addition can be constructed
using temporary material; the mockup can then be photographed
and evaluated from critical vantage points.