Home  Product and Services Guide  Stories, articles, and how-to's  Old-House-Friends Forums
"New Exterior Additions to Historic Buildings" an Historic Preservation Brief January 9, 2009


How to clean rain lamp...
Member Sign In|Company Sign In





New Exterior Additions to Historic Buildings
Preservation Concerns

Kay D. Weeks
New Exterior Additions to Historic Buildings

What's in this article



less detail


Introduction

Acknowledging Change While Protecting Historical Significance

Scope of National Park Service Interest in New Exterior Additions

        Preserving Significant Historic Materials and Features

        Preserving the Historic Character

        Protecting the Historical Significance

Conclusion

New Exterior Additions to Historic Buildings

        Preserve Significant Historic Materials and Features

        Preserve the Historic Character

        Make a Visual Distinction Between Old and New

Selected Reading

Acknowledgements


Return to the Knowledge Base

 << Previous Page 
Viewing Page 3 of 8
Next Page >> 

1. Preserving Significant Historic Materials and Features

Connecting a new exterior addition always involves some degree of material loss to an external wall of a historic building and, although this is to be expected, it can be minimized. On the other hand, damage or destruction of significant materials and craftsmanship such as pressed brick, decorative marble, cast stone, terra-cotta, or architectural metal should be avoided, when possible.

Generally speaking, preservation of historic buildings is enhanced by avoiding all but minor changes to primary or "public" elevations. Historically, features that distinguish one building or a row of buildings and can be seen from the streets or sidewalks are most likely to be the significant ones. This can include window patterns, window hoods, or shutters; porticoes, entrances, and doorways; roof shapes, cornices, and decorative moldings; or commercial storefronts with their special detailing, signs, and glazing. Beyond a single building, entire blocks of urban or residential structures are often closely related architecturally by their materials, detailing, form, and alignment. Because significant materials and features should be preserved, not damaged or hidden, the first place to consider constructing a new addition is where such material loss will be minimized. This will frequently be on a secondary side or rear elevation. For both economic and social reasons, secondary elevations were often constructed of "common" material and were less architecturally ornate or detailed.

appropriate new glass connector between two historic buildings
Two historic commercial buildings were successfully joined as part of a larger rehabilitation project. The glass connector detail is shown below. Photo: Martha L. Werenfels, AIA.

In constructing the new addition, one way to minimize overall material loss is simply to reduce the size of the new addition in relationship to the historic building. If a new addition will abut the historic building along one elevation or wrap around a side and rear elevation, the integration of historic and new interiors may result in a high degree of loss--exterior walls as well as significant interior spaces and features. Another way to minimize loss is to limit the size and number of openings between

set back of small glass connector
This small glass connector between two historic buildings is appropriately set back. This approach meets the Standards for Rehabilitation. Photo: Martha L. Werenfels, AIA.
old and new.

A particularly successful method to reduce damage is to link the new addition to the historic block by means of a hyphen or connector. In this way, only the connecting passageway penetrates a historic side wall; the new addition can be visually and functionally related while historic materials remain essentially intact and historic exteriors remain uncovered.

Although a general recommendation is to construct a new addition on a secondary elevation, there are several exceptions. First, there may simply be no secondary elevation--some important freestanding buildings have significant materials and features on all sides, making any above-ground addition too destructive to be considered. Second, a structure or group of structures together with their setting (for example, in a National Historic Park) may be of such significance in American history that any new addition would not only damage materials and alter the buildings' relationship to each other and the setting, but seriously diminish the public's ability to appreciate a historic event or place. Finally, there are other cases where an existing side or rear elevation was historically intended to be highly visible, is of special cultural importance to the neighborhood, or possesses associative historical value. Then, too, a secondary elevation should be treated as if it were a primary elevation and a new addition should be avoided.


 << Previous Page 
Viewing Page 3 of 8
Next Page >> 



  Ads by Google

  Members:  Sign In  |  Register  |  Benefits  |  Feedback  |  Tell-a-Friend  |  Help
  Companies:  Sign In  |  Account Manager  |  Promote Your Company  |  Register  |  Help Advertise

Copyright ©2009 by Renovators, a TB Systems company. All rights reserved. Privacy policy.