Mortars for repointing should be softer or more permeable than the masonry
units and no harder or more impermeable than the historic mortar to prevent
damage to the masonry units. It is a common error to assume that hardness or
high strength is a measure of appropriateness, particularly for lime-based
historic mortars. Stresses within a wall caused by expansion, contraction,
moisture migration, or settlement must be accommodated in some manner; in a
masonry wall, these stresses should be relieved by the mortar rather than by
the masonry units. A mortar that is stronger in compressive strength than the
masonry units will not "give," thus causing stresses to be relieved through
the masonry units--resulting in permanent damage to the masonry, such as
cracking and spalling, that cannot be repaired easily.
This early 19th century building is being repointed with lime mortar. Photo: John P. Speweik.
|
While
stresses can also break the bond between the mortar and the masonry units,
permitting water to penetrate the resulting hairline cracks, this is easier to
correct in the joint through repointing than if the break occurs in the
masonry units.
Permeability, or rate of vapor transmission, is also critical. High lime
mortars are more permeable than denser cement mortars. Historically, mortar
acted as a bedding material--not unlike an expansion joint--rather than a
"glue" for the masonry units, and moisture was able to migrate through the
mortar joints rather than the masonry units. When moisture evaporates from
the masonry it deposits any soluble salts either on the surface as
efflorescence or below the surface as subflorescence. While
salts deposited on the surface of masonry units are usually relatively
harmless, salt crystallization within a masonry unit creates pressure that can
cause parts ofthe outer surface to spall off or delaminate. If the mortar
does not permitmoisture or moisture vapor to migrate out of the wall and
evaporate, theresult will be damage to the masonry units.