A window which is repaired should be made as energy efficient
as possible by the use of appropriate weatherstripping to reduce
air infiltration. A wide variety of products are available to
assist in this task. Felt may be fastened to the top, bottom,
and meeting rails, but may have the disadvantage of absorbing
and holding moisture, particularly at the bottom rail. Rolled
vinyl strips may also be tacked into place in appropriate locations
to reduce infiltration. Metal strips or new plastic spring strips
may be used on the rails and, if space permits, in the channels
between the sash and jamb. Weatherstripping is a historic treatment,
but old weatherstripping (felt) is not likely to perform very
satisfactorily. Appropriate contemporary weatherstripping should
be considered an integral part of the repair process for windows.
The use of sash locks installed on the meeting rail will insure
that the sash are kept tightly closed so that the weatherstripping
will function more effectively to reduce infiltration. Although
such locks will not always be historically accurate, they will
usually be viewed as an acceptable contemporary modification in
the interest of improved thermal performance.
Many styles of storm windows are available to improve the thermal
performance of existing windows. The use of exterior storm windows
should be investigated whenever feasible because they are thermally
efficient, cost-effective, reversible, and allow the retention
of original windows (see "Preservation Briefs: 3").
Storm window frames may be made of wood, aluminum, vinyl, or plastic;
however, the use of unfinished aluminum storms should be avoided.
The visual impact of storms may be minimized by selecting colors
which match existing trim color. Arched top storms are available
for windows with special shapes. Although interior storm windows
appear to offer an attractive option for achieving double glazing
with minimal visual impact, the potential for damaging condensation
problems must be addressed. Moisture which becomes trapped between
the layers of glazing can condense on the colder, outer prime
window, potentially leading to deterioration. The correct approach
to using interior storms is to create a seal on the interior storm
while allowing some ventilation around the prime window. In actual
practice, the creation of such a durable, airtight seal is difficult.
Although the retention of original or existing windows is always
desirable and this Brief is intended to encourage that goal, there
is a point when the condition of a window may clearly indicate
replacement. The decision process for selecting replacement windows
should not begin with a survey of contemporary window products
which are available as replacements, but should begin with a look
at the windows which are being replaced. Attempt to understand
the contribution of the window(s) to the appearance of the facade
including: 1) the pattern of the openings and their size; 2) proportions
of the frame and sash; 3) configuration of window panes; 4) muntin
profiles; 5) type of wood; 6) paint color; 7) characteristics
of the glass; and 8) associated details such as arched tops, hoods,
or other decorative elements. Develop an understanding of how
the window reflects the period, style, or regional characteristics
of the building, or represents technological development.
Armed with an awareness of the significance of the existing window,
begin to search for a replacement which retains as much of the
character of the historic window as possible. There are many sources
of suitable new windows. Continue looking until an acceptable
replacement can be found. Check building supply firms, local woodworking
mills, carpenters, preservation oriented magazines, or catalogs
or suppliers of old building materials, for product information.
Local historical associations and state historic preservation
offices may be good sources of information on products which have
been used successfully in preservation projects.
Consider energy efficiency as one of the factors for replacements,
but do not let it dominate the issue. Energy conservation is no
excuse for the wholesale destruction of historic windows which
can be made thermally efficient by historically and aesthetically
acceptable means. In fact, a historic wooden window with a high
quality storm window added should thermally outperform a new double-glazed
metal window which does not have thermal breaks (insulation between
the inner and outer frames intended to break the path of heat
flow). This occurs because the wood has far better insulating
value than the metal, and in addition many historic windows have
high ratios of wood to glass, thus reducing the area of highest
heat transfer. One measure of heat transfer is the U-value, the
number of Btu's per hour transferred through a square foot of
material. When comparing thermal performance, the lower the U-value
the better the performance. According to ASHRAE 1977 Fundamentals,
the U-values for single glazed wooden windows range from 0.88 to
0.99. The addition of a storm window should reduce these figures
to a range of 0.44 to 0.49. A non-thermal break, double-glazed metal
window has a U-value of about 0.6.