Balancing Seismic
Retrofit and Preservation
Reinforcing a historic building to meet new
construction requirements, as prescribed by many building codes, can destroy
much of a historic building’s appearance and integrity. This is because
the most expedient ways to reinforce a building according to such codes
are to impose structural members and to fill irregularities or large openings,
regardless of the placement of architectural detail. The results can be
quite intrusive. However, structural reinforcement can be
introduced sensitively. In such cases, its design, placement, patterning,
and detailing respect the historic character of the building, even when
the reinforcement itself is visible.
 Before |
 Before |
 After |
 After |
|
Both exteriors and interiors can be severely damaged in an earthquake. This
Craftsman Style bungalow was successfully rehabilitated and seismically upgraded after the
Northridge earthquake in California. Photos: Courtesy, Historic Preservation Partners in Earthquake Response.
|
Three important preservation principles should
be kept in mind when undertaking seismic retrofit projects:
Historic materials should be preserved
and retained to the greatest extent possible and not replaced wholesale
in the process of seismic strengthening;
-
New seismic retrofit systems, whether
hidden or exposed, should respect the character and integrity of the historic
building and be visually compatible with it in design; and,
Seismic work should be "reversible"
to the greatest extent possible to allow removal for future use of improved
systems and traditional repair of remaining historic materials.
It is strongly advised that all owners of
historically significant buildings contemplating seismic retrofit become
familiar with The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the
Treatment of Historic Properties, which are published by the National
Park Service and cited in the bibliography of this publication. These standards
identify approaches for working with historic buildings, including preservation,
rehabilitation, and restoration. Code-required work to make buildings functional
and safe is an integral component of each approach identified in the Standards.
While some seismic upgrading work is more permanent than reversible, care
must be taken to preserve historic materials to the greatest extent possible
and for new work to have a minimal visual impact on the historic appearance
of the building.